Moderna Archive -

Dr Robert Hess: Weekly Omicron Update

Dr Robert Hess – 12/11/2021

Dr Robert Hess: Weekly Omicron Update

Teams of researchers around the world are working hard to understand the new Omicron variant of the coronavirus. It is the most highly differentiated among the five variants that have so far qualified for the World Health Organization classification “variant of concern” since the pandemic began.

The number of cases in South Africa has risen rapidly to nearly 20,000 per day since the country first reported the discovery of Omicron two weeks ago. In the weeks leading up to that, the number of COVID-19 cases in the country had remained relatively low, even though only 26% of the population was fully vaccinated. With a vaccination rate of under 30% and many South Africans having most likely been infected naturally at some point, it will be interesting to see if the same rapid rise in cases occurs in countries with a high take-up of mRNA vaccines.

There are three important questions, the answers to which will indicate the likely impact of Omicron on countries around the world. How transmissible is this new variant of coronavirus?
How well is it able to evade the antibodies and T‑cells that make up the immune defenses of both the vaccinated and unvaccinated? And what is the probability that an infection with Omicron will be severe, resulting in the hospitalization and possibly death of an infected person?

How easily does Omicron spread?
The Omicron variant spreads more readily than the original “wild type” SARS CoV-2 virus first identified in Wuhan. This is already evident from the numbers coming in from all around the world. How easily Omicron spreads compared to Delta is not yet clear. According to a study by Professor Hiroshi Nishiura of the Health and Environmental Sciences Department at Kyoto University in Japan, who specializes in mathematical modeling of infectious diseases, the Omicron variant of COVID-19 is 4.2 times more transmissible in the early stages than Delta – a finding that is likely to confirm fears about the contagiousness of the new strain.
Furthermore, scientists believe that anyone infected with Omicron can transmit the virus to others, even if they are vaccinated or have no symptoms.

Will Omicron cause more severe disease progression?
More data is needed to assess whether Omicron infections – especially reinfections and breakthrough infections in individuals who are fully vaccinated – cause more severe disease or death than infections with other variants. There are fears that Omicron could cause more damage around the world than Delta, and the WHO has warned that outbreaks with “severe consequences” could occur. However, the surge in cases in South Africa following the emergence of the variant in the country has not yet led to hospital overload, so there is currently a degree of confidence that Omicron will not trigger more severe courses of the disease. However, it is important to note that the first reported cases involved university students – younger people whose lifestyle exposes them to greater risk of infection – so it will be days to weeks before the severity of the Omicron variant is fully known. There is no information as yet to suggest that the symptoms associated with Omicron are different from those of other variants.

Do vaccines work against Omicron?
The current crop of vaccines are expected to offer a certain percentage rate of protection against severe illness, hospitalization and death due to infection with the Omicron variant. Studies are being conducted around the world to establish the actual level of protection. Moderna and Pfizer/BioNTech are currently testing their existing vaccines against the Omicron variant with a view to modifying them if the results should prove disappointing.

To study the effectiveness of a vaccine against a particular variant of Sars-CoV-2, researchers typically carry out what are called “neutralization tests”. They look to see how many antibodies a vaccinated person has in his or her blood that can bind to the viral variant and thus eliminate it. However, the true protection status of vaccinated persons cannot be completely determined in this way; clinical studies involving several thousand volunteers are needed, or evaluations of the speed at which the disease is spreading.

Last Wednesday, Sandra Ciesek, a virologist at Frankfurt University Hospital, published initial results showing a significantly reduced antibody response to the new Omicron variant. According to Ciesek, the data lends weight to the suggestion that the development of a vaccine specially adapted to Omicron is the way ahead. On Tuesday, South African experts had already presented similar data showing a weaker antibody response to Omicron in vaccinated individuals. Researchers at the Africa Health Research Institute in South Africa released preliminary data on the effectiveness of the BioNTech/Pfizer vaccine against Omicron. The results suggest that the viral variant escapes the antibody response of twice-vaccinated individuals, whereas a third booster jab neutralizes the new variant. Antibody levels against the Omicron variant are as high after booster vaccination as they are against the wild type after two doses. In vaccinated individuals who had also been infected at some stage, a substantial antibody response was also measurable.

Scientists emphasize that Omicron still relies on the same biological mechanism as the other corona variants to attack human cells. Consequently, T-cells and antibodies continue to have a protective effect. If it turns out that the efficacy of vaccines against Omicron falls below 50%, then this variant would come under our definition of a “super mutant”. We will present scenarios for this again as more data become available.

Breakthrough infections in people who are fully vaccinated can still be expected.

Will therapies and treatments work against Omicron?
Scientists are seeking to determine how well existing treatments work against COVID-19. Because of Omicron’s altered genetic profile, it is likely that some treatments will remain effective, while others may be less so.

What are the vaccine manufacturers saying?
On Wednesday, Moderna CEO Stephen Hog announced that his company could have a COVID-19 booster vaccine targeting the Omicron variant tested and ready for approval in the USA as early as March. Moderna said in a statement that booster vaccines with genes that specifically target mutations in the newly discovered Omicron variant would be the fastest way to address the reduction in vaccine efficacy which the variant is expected to cause. The company is also working on a multivalent vaccine that would target up to four different coronavirus variants, including Omicron.

Moderna, as well as Pfizer/BioNTech, have already started to work on the further development of their vaccines. How long it will take for these to be approved is as yet unknown. Given previous guidance from the U.S. Food and Drug Administration, which requires mid-stage clinical trials, the process could take three or four months. According to Stephen Hoge, the Omicron-specific boosters will not realistically be ready for rollout until March or possibly the second quarter – unless, of course, the FDA changes its guidance on the data needed for approval.

One dilemma we currently face is whether to recommend a booster jab with one of the existing vaccines or to wait. And how can we prevent the emergence of more virulent pathogens in the future?
The data on the risk posed by the Omicron variant is gradually building up and becoming clearer. Nevertheless, based on what we know so far, booster vaccinations provide relatively good protection, if not against an actual infection, then definitely against severe disease. Moreover, this is for the moment our only proven effective weapon in the fight against the virus. Scientific opinion is that an x-fold reduction in neutralizing activity does not necessarily mean that a vaccine is x times less protective. The actual loss of immunity is much less, and the triple vaccination is the best protection we have.
New vaccines are not expected until after the winter wave washes over the northern hemisphere, so politicians continue to push the booster programs. However, if the FDA and other regulatory agencies change their rules, the process of approving a new, more effective vaccine against Omicron could be significantly accelerated. We expect to have more information and data on this in the run-up to Christmas, so for now, we are adopting a wait-and-see approach, especially for our clients who are under no particular time pressure as regards boosting and are reasonably well placed in terms of antibody count and T-cell immunity.

Another matter that concerns us is how new mutations and vaccination regimes should be dealt with in the future. Some scientists believe that vaccines and the mass distribution of them in industrialized countries could lead to the emergence of even more virulent pathogens. Conventional wisdom holds that natural selection eliminates highly lethal pathogens, as the death of the host greatly reduces transmission to other persons. Vaccines that keep the host alive but still allow transmission could therefore enable highly virulent strains to circulate in a population. The data that we have accumulated so far shows that vaccines against diseases that do not prevent transmission can create conditions that favor the emergence of pathogen strains capable of causing more severe disease in unvaccinated hosts.

Importantly, most vaccine experts agree that current vaccines still protect against severe disease and death in the event of Omicron infection. Thus, we are not left completely defenseless. However, once again, timing is critical here in deciding whether to boost now with one of the vaccines already available or to wait and boost with a next-generation vaccine. We know from our private sources that vaccine adaptation will be on a far greater scale than previously assumed. In addition, the definition of “fully vaccinated” status will be expanded from double vaccination to triple vaccination. We will be weighing this carefully over the next few weeks and will keep you updated.

We wish to reiterate that my Premium clients can contact us at any time if they have any concerns regarding booster vaccination or vaccination status or if a change is pending. We only give out highly individual recommendations in this regard – a refinement in procedure that is currently gaining more and more relevance.

Dr Robert Hess: Update on Booster jabs and vaccine breakthroughs.

Dr Robert Hess – 11/26/2021

Dr Robert Hess: Update on Booster jabs and vaccine breakthroughs.

Infection rates in Germany, Austria and the Netherlands have risen to a new and worrying high. Hospitals have had to postpone planned surgical procedures, and intensive care units are rapidly filling up. The situation in Germany is unfortunately a forerunner of what is likely to happen in the United States soon. The UK had the unwelcome distinction of being ahead of the curve in Western Europe, although the rate there now seems to be leveling off. We expect the current fourth wave will hit the USA in a few weeks. There are two main reasons for this: firstly, waning vaccine efficacy paired with vaccine breakthroughs, and secondly, the slow progress being made by the booster vaccination campaign. More and more studies are showing what we already concluded a few weeks ago, namely that the protection afforded by the vaccines is declining at a rapid rate and that antibody counts are also falling fast.

Eleven months ago, there was great jubilation at the test results from a study conducted by BioNTech which showed that their vaccine had a 95% success rate against infection with the SARS-CoV-2 virus. Not long after, Moderna reported a similar impressive result. This was all the more encouraging, because the FDA had set a modest efficacy threshold of only 50%. Since then, billions of people have been vaccinated against the coronavirus, and numerous studies have confirmed the high protective effect in practice.

Unfortunately, it is now clear that even a double dose of vaccine is not going to be enough to end the pandemic. There were indications of this relatively early on when the initially high antibody titers in the blood of vaccinated individuals dropped again just a few months after they had received their second dose. In Israel, which had vaccinated its population earlier and faster than any other country, the infection curve rose steeply again in the summer, but this has since been flattened out and brought under control by the booster vaccination roll-out.

In Germany, too, it is primarily unvaccinated Covid-19 patients who are occupying beds in intensive care units, but the number of breakthrough infections is also rising. This does not come as a complete surprise from an immunological perspective, as we know that vaccine protection gradually wears off after approximately six months.

Large-scale analyses from different countries now reveal the extent to which vaccine protection declines over time. Scientists in Israel recently published the results from their analysis of cases involving vaccinated adults who had contracted Covid-19 between 11th and 30th July. These showed that individuals who had been vaccinated seven months earlier were at twice the risk of infection as those who had been vaccinated only five months earlier. A study by Pfizer also reached the same conclusion.

An analysis from Sweden produced an even more unpleasant surprise. The research team there found that protection against infection was no longer detectable at all seven months after vaccination and that even protection against hospitalization was down to only 42 percent. Another study from the UK made a comparison using the case-control method. According to this observational study, protection against infection two months after vaccination was 96 percent compared to the placebo group. Five to seven months later, however, it had dropped to 84 percent. Data from the USA also show the diminishing effect.

The effectiveness fades particularly quickly in the elderly, whose immune system responds more weakly anyway. And people in this most at-risk group are precisely the ones whose protection depends on vaccination administered more than six months previously.

With a large proportion of its population now triple-vaccinated, Israel seems to have broken the fourth wave. A recently published analysis shows the effect of the booster campaign, with protection for recipients of the third dose now restored to a highly satisfactory 93-percent level.

The data we have gathered had already indicated the dwindling protection afforded by the vaccines, and what we already suspected has now been confirmed by the latest analyses and studies. The third jab is not “just” a booster per se, but rather complements the vaccination series. According to our data, a third dose of the vaccine finesses immunity and completes the vaccination protection. The antibodies after a third shot are usually in a range that cannot be achieved by just two. This means that, even if vaccine efficacy slowly declines again after a third dose (and it will), it does so from a higher baseline and thus probably more slowly. We are working on the assumption that “fully vaccinated” status will soon no longer apply to those who have had only two doses. How policymakers and governments react to this remains to be seen.
Vaccine breakthroughs are becoming an increasingly acute problem, and booster vaccination is currently the only way to tackle it. The more people, especially the elderly, receive booster vaccinations, the more we will be able to flatten out the wave. In our opinion, countries that have a vaccination rate below 70% and in which the population received their first and second vaccinations early are at a disadvantage in this scenario. The recommendations we make to our clients will continue to be on an individual and, above all, laboratory-dependent basis. This means that we look at the overall picture of antibody quantity and quality, T‑cell immunity and general immune system status. Our recommendations are therefore not country-dependent and may therefore not necessarily be in accordance with national rules and regulations.

We expect that the future will bring more opportunities to recommend full protection against Covid-19. Although vaccination is currently our main pillar of defense, we expect that other methods such as approved antiviral drugs, more effective antibody therapies and differentiated vaccination regimens will be increasingly incorporated into the protection program in the near future.

Dr Robert Hess: What next for the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic?

Dr Robert Hess – 11/02/2021

What next for the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic?

The number of infections worldwide is on the increase, and with it, the number of vaccine breakthroughs. However, it is not only the rising rate of infection that is the root cause of this, but also the waning effect of the vaccines themselves. Nevertheless, individuals without any form of immunization are significantly less protected against COVID‑19 disease, and the mRNA booster jabs seem to be delivering on their promise of offering almost complete protection. There are multiple factors at play here that will continue to occupy our attention this winter. In the meantime, this is how we see the current situation.

How prevalent are vaccine breakthroughs, and has their number increased? The number of vaccine breakthroughs worldwide is increasing. All manufacturers and vaccines are affected. A vaccine breakthrough occurs when a fully vaccinated person contracts a coronavirus infection with clinical symptoms.

According to the weekly report issued by the Robert Koch Institute (RKI), 95,487 fully vaccinated persons in Germany, have already been infected with the coronavirus since February. In the week of 27th September ‑ 24 October alone, almost 41,000 vaccine breakthroughs occurred among 18- to 59-year-olds. Measured across the entire period since the start of the vaccination campaign in Germany, the percentage of vaccine breakthroughs among symptomatic COVID‑19 cases in this age group has risen to 10.9. However, if we look only at the last four weeks, the ratio is significantly higher at 37.5 percent.
Increases can also be observed in the over‑60s age group, where the percentage of vaccine breakthroughs among symptomatic COVID‑19 cases is 16.1 for the period since the start of the vaccination campaign. And when we take the figures from only the last four weeks, this percentage increases to 58.9.
Other European health authorities are also reporting that, in some regions, half of the new infections are among the fully vaccinated, and the trend is unfortunately upwards. According to the UK government, four out of ten new hospital patients currently being admitted for coronavirus infection have been vaccinated.
In the USA, breakthrough infections were studied in six states – California, Colorado, Massachusetts, Oregon, Utah, Vermont and Virginia – as the authorities there collect the most detailed data on the disease. Whether their findings can be extrapolated to the entire USA is therefore unclear, but breakthrough infections in those six states accounted for 18 to 28 percent of registered cases during September. Among those who had been vaccinated, Johnson & Johnson recipients displayed slightly higher rates of vaccine breakthrough and of related deaths. Additionally, those vaccinated with Pfizer-BioNTech had slightly higher rates than recipients of Moderna, which can most likely be attributed to dosage differences.

Which age groups are affected?
Vaccination breakthroughs are occurring in all age groups. The proportion of breakthroughs is highest among individuals over 60 years of age. In both the EU and the USA, it appears that it is mainly older persons who are being hospitalized with the more acute infections, as well as individuals whose immune system is relatively weak or who have some sort of immunodeficiency. According to CDC data, 74 percent of vaccine breakthroughs occur in adults aged 65 and older.

Why are there so many vaccine breakthroughs?
The statistics show that vaccine breakthroughs tend to increase as more people are vaccinated against a particular pathogen. In the case of SARS-CoV-2, however, this is not the only reason, as multiple factors are involved here. Firstly, the virus now has renewed opportunities to spread, because most countries have relaxed their regulations on social distancing and face coverings, and because the northern hemisphere is entering the colder winter months. Secondly, the dominant form of the virus is still the Delta variant which is more contagious than the original “wild type” (i.e. Wuhan) or successor Alpha variant and also more successful in undermining vaccine efficacy.

In our opinion, the reason why vaccine breakthroughs have increased so rapidly, especially in recent weeks, is due to dwindling vaccine protection. Current studies even indicate that protection could be as low as 20 per cent only four months after the second dose of a COVID‑19 vaccine. Although a double dose is effective against the Delta variant, the protection it affords begins to diminish after only 30 days. A British study in August found that the effectiveness of the vaccine dropped to 90%, 85% and 78% after 30, 60 and 90 days, respectively. The data from such studies may vary, but the take-home message is that we too have observed the phenomenon of rapidly declining protection during the regular antibody level checks we perform on our clients. We therefore have to assume that the antibodies developed as a result of vaccination wane more quickly than was previously thought and generally published.

So, what are the causes of vaccine breakthrough?
Weakened immune system and age: An already weakened immune system will often be a decisive factor. This mostly affects cancer patients undergoing chemotherapy, patients with autoimmune diseases or the elderly. Especially in senior citizens, it is often the case that the immune system no longer responds adequately to immunization.

Mutations: Mutations also impair the effectiveness of the vaccine. The aggressive and significantly more contagious Delta variant reduces the efficacy of the vaccines. This is because this mutation is better adapted than its predecessors to evade the antibodies that are formed after vaccination. Although the current crop of vaccines are also effective against the Delta variant, more antibodies are needed to neutralize it.

Waning effect: As with almost all vaccines, the effect wears off after some time. This seems to be happening somewhat faster with the COVID‑19 vaccines than initially thought. Data from Israel gathered around mid-July 2021 was already indicating that the effectiveness of the BioNTech/Pfizer vaccine had begun to diminish. Israel was therefore one of the first countries to recognize the need for a follow-up booster jab. Their data showed that, after three months, antibody concentration was reduced by about half.

So, is vaccination pointless?
No, on the contrary. Vaccination protects against infection and, above all, staves off a severe course of the disease. Even if the protection against infection declines over time, protection against the potentially severe consequences remains. According to the CDC study, vaccinated people are eight times less likely to become infected and 25 times less likely to be hospitalized and/or die. A survey of intensive care units also confirms that most COVID‑19 patients admitted are unvaccinated. Data from the UK and Europe suggests that vaccination affords 90% protection against hospitalization. Among those aged 60 and older, protection against the risk of hospitalization is 86 percent. Corona vaccines protect against a fatal outcome by as much as 98 percent (87 percent in the over-60s). But in any case, the only sensible way to drive down the rising number of infections is to refresh vaccine protection with a booster jab.

How important are booster jabs?
Due to the rising numbers of vaccine breakthroughs, booster vaccination has taken on a new urgency. Some countries fear they will be entering a fourth wave around Christmas time, and governments are appealing to their citizens to get their booster without delay. But the vaccination program is faltering in many places, and the approach taken by individual countries also varies greatly. In Germany, the booster vaccine is so far only recommended for the over-70s and the immunocompromised. On Friday, however, the German health minister spoke out in favor of offering booster vaccination to all citizens. Sweden and the USA currently offer a booster jab to everyone over the age of 65 and the UK to everyone over 50 (as well as the immunocompromised, health workers, the occupationally exposed, etc.). Israel has already completed the majority of its booster vaccinations. The country was already battling a fourth coronavirus wave in the summer but now seems to have survived the immediate crisis. According to the Israeli health authorities, this is mainly due to the widely administered third vaccination against the virus.

Until now, all booster vaccinations have been given at least six months after the second dose of Pfizer/BioNTech or Moderna. The length of this interval is now up for debate, especially in view of rapidly declining antibody levels. Thanks to our capacity for monitoring the individual antibody levels of our clients, we have been able to ascertain that some would benefit from a booster jab as early as four months after the second dose. If the vaccine administered was J&J, a booster is already appropriate after only four weeks. This is an option that we also recommend, as we have found that the antibody gain from vaccination with J&J is insufficient.

With governments adopting so many different approaches and also national graphs peaking at different times, it will be interesting to see what stage the pandemic has reached in different countries two or three months further along the line.

What do initial data on the effectiveness of the Pfizer/BioNTech booster tell us?
The first full study has shown that a third dose of the Pfizer vaccine provides an “excellent” level of immunity. On 21st October, Pfizer/BioNTech shared results from their Phase 3 study involving more than 10,000 volunteers. These showed that the booster jab conferred 95.6 percent efficacy. In the half cohort who did not receive booster vaccination, 109 persons later became symptomatically infected. In the half who had received booster vaccination, this number was only five. It also showed that those who received a third dose of the Pfizer vaccine almost a year after their first two had higher protection against symptomatic infections than those who had received only two doses. An earlier study based on real-world population data from Israel found a similar increase in protection against serious illness.

Scientists believe that a decrease in the protection afforded by the first two doses is more than compensated for by the third. However, this refers only to a complete and exclusive series of Pfizer/BioNTech vaccination; there are no comparable data yet on the effectiveness of a third dose of Pfizer/BioNTech to top up a course of AstraZeneca or J&J. Two further studies on booster vaccines were also published in the October edition of New England Journal of Medicine. One found that antibody levels to the Delta variant increased almost tenfold after a booster shot of the Pfizer vaccine. We too have observed this antibody increase in our clients who had already received a booster vaccination.

The long-term prospects may at first seem somewhat daunting, but the data speak for themselves. SARS-CoV-2 will remain with us for the foreseeable future, and we will therefore have to learn how best to live with it. Although we may have hoped for even more ways to combat the coronavirus at this point, science never sleeps and we expect that there will be more to come in the future, including not only new vaccines but also drugs to treat a COVID‑19 infection. Apart from having a well-armed immune system, our defenses against a SARS-CoV-2 infection are “limited” to the best available vaccines. But this weapon seems to be effective enough when applied correctly and affords satisfactory protection for the time being. The realization that antibody levels decrease more rapidly than expected after a second dose of vaccine came as a surprise to many, but the phenomenon of diminishing protection over time is nothing new and can also be observed with many other vaccines.

Vaccines and subsequent responses by the immune system are under permanent review and subject to reinterpretation. While constant chopping and changing of rules and regulations may not always be entirely understandable and can at times be unsettling and demoralizing, it is the only realistic way to tackle the pandemic. We learn something new every day. The biggest advantage we see for our clients in this context is that we are not only privy to the latest research findings but can also incorporate them directly into our individual client concept. The specific data on each individual enables us to make precisely tailored recommendations regarding optimal protection against COVID‑19 and to use our own A.I. data sets in the process. Especially against the background of faster than expected decline in antibody levels and T-cell immunity, this puts us at an enormous advantage.

As we cannot yet predict how severe the coming winter will be, we would urge you to continue to maintain your immunity by following our general recommendations and taking your individually formulated supplements regularly. We will keep you informed and continue to advise you individually on booster vaccinations. If you have any questions, do not hesitate to contact our team of consultants.

Dr Robert Hess: A first step in the right direction

Dr Robert Hess – 09/21/2021

Dr Robert Hess: A first step in the right direction: BioNTech introduces the “individualization” concept into vaccination strategy.

Where are we now, almost two years into the pandemic? Nine months after the first vaccines for the prevention of Covid-19 were approved, are there any conclusions that can be reliably drawn? Since December 2020, 2.39 billion people worldwide have been vaccinated against Covid-19, with a total of 5.82 billion doses having been administered. Just under 30% of the world’s population has thus been fully vaccinated, and in the United States that figure has now passed the 50% mark.

The raw data on how well the vaccines perform against infection with Covid-19 and on whether they provide sufficient protection are well known. Vaccinated individuals are less likely to become infected and, if they should nonetheless contract the virus, the course of the disease is generally much less severe. These statistics are enough to persuade most people, despite the acknowledged risk of vaccine side-effects. So, how are we to weigh up the advantages of vaccination in preventing a disease that can cause long-term harm and even death against the possible side-effects? This is the dilemma in which a large proportion of the population find themselves, depending on age, pre-existing conditions and personal conviction.

In the current circumstances, it is difficult to find the objective middle ground, as there are many different perspectives on the matter. On the one hand, we are currently witnessing a mass clinical trial, in which all those who line up for vaccination are effectively test subjects, and the scientific community is on standby to respond to any side-effects that manifest themselves. These side-effects range from minor local reactions and discomfort after injection to fever, pain, nausea, swelling of the lymph nodes, sensory disturbances, autoimmune disorders and blood clotting. One of the most recent findings was an increased incidence of myocarditis (inflammation of the heart muscle) or pericarditis (inflammation of the tissue that surrounds the heart) associated with a second dose of an mRNA vaccine, an occurrence more frequently observed in adolescent males. This again highlights the potential severity of such side-effects and also the importance of meticulously thorough monitoring.

On the other hand, we are approaching the point where the sheer number of vaccine doses and the thoroughness of monitoring make the detection of further rare diseases increasingly unlikely. Reliable data is available for the elderly who were vaccinated first in the USA, Europe and elsewhere. Nevertheless, there are always the “unknown unknowns”. In other words, vaccines against Covid-19 could theoretically set in motion internal processes that we could not have anticipated. For the moment, at least, the vaccines are safe and surprisingly effective, but what about three years further down the road? We cannot know today what the long-term results will be. The current crop of vaccines are based on an entirely new scientific principle which we are only just beginning to understand. So the question arises as to which groups of people should they be used on? It’s like this: if you are 60 years old, you won’t want to take the approximately one percent risk of dying from corona. In the case of children or unborn fetuses who still have their whole life ahead of them, however, the possibility of long-term complications is a major consideration.

Dr Robert Hess believes that this dilemma should be tackled by means of a specific strategy, with the key concept being “individualization”. The current aim of governments and of the World Health Organization is to vaccinate as many people as possible and thereby maximize protection against infection with SARS‑CoV‑2. Yet this is supposed to happen in a world where individuality counts for more than at any time in history. This issue, which is at the very least defined by differences in age, gender and ethnicity is largely ignored. A structured and finely-tuned individualization plan, such as the one Dr Robert Hess creates, would not only identify risk groups and thus avoid vaccination side-effects, but would also have a positive effect on vaccination success and help to reassure those elements of society who are vehemently opposed. Our individualization plan comprises analysis of age, sex, medical history, risk factors and exposure, vaccine dose and immune status, as well as T-cell immunity and antibody titers against SARS‑CoV‑2.

A strategy of individualization has not yet been introduced on a broad scale, as the focus of the vaccination campaign is currently on the total number of doses administered rather than on the welfare of the individual. Which is not surprising, as there are limitations on the extent to which a policy of individualization can be implemented.

We were therefore delighted to learn last week that the BioNTech team have taken the first step towards individualization in their vaccination concept, specifically in terms of dose adjustment. BioNTech plans to apply for approval of its corona vaccine for children between the ages of five and eleven in the coming weeks. The data for this should be available by the end of September. The dose for this age group will be ten micrograms, which is one third of that given to adults. The data for even younger children (aged 6 months to 4 years) should be available towards the end of the year. Here, too, they expect that the dose can be further lowered.

The study results are already available and must now be finalized for submission to the regulatory authorities. The European Medicines Agency (EMA) has stated that it cannot yet give a timeframe for possible approval. However, BioNTech is already preparing the production of the vaccine doses, so that the vaccination of children between five and eleven years of age could start as early as mid-October. Clinical trials are underway in the USA for both the Pfizer/BioNTech and Moderna vaccines. Previously, there had been delays because the FDA had required a greater number of child participants in the clinical trials being conducted by both BioNTech and Moderna.

According to immunologist Anthony Fauci, the vaccination of children in the States could begin in late autumn or early winter. For younger children, it may take a little longer, as the age groups six months to two years and two to five years are being tested separately. In late July, Israel became the first and so far only country to give the green light for BioNTech/Pfizer to be administered to children in the five to 11 age range who are at risk of serious health complications such as brain, heart or lung problems.

The Pfizer/BioNTech vaccine has been licensed for administration to children aged 12 and upwards since the end of May 2021, and the Moderna vaccine for the same age group since July 2021, but to date there is no vaccine specifically for children, particularly those in the 0-12 age group, which is why the dose adjustment announced now and further clinical research in the field is so important. Possible late complications of vaccination and undesirable side-effects in children can thus be counteracted.

In summary, we can say that we are looking forward to this development and will continue to follow it with great interest. It makes us all the more convinced of the importance and benefits of the individualization program, and we will continue to use this as the basis for our analyses and recommendations of Dr Robert Hess. If you have any further questions about our strategy and our individualization program, please do not hesitate to contact one of Dr Robert Hess consultants.

Dr Robert Hess: Any decision on whether to receive a booster jab

Dr Robert Hess – 08/17/2021

Dr Robert Hess: Any decision on whether to receive a booster jab (and which one to choose) or to wait for a next-generation vaccine should be based on the following criteria.

1 – Which is preferable – a booster jab or a next-generation vaccine? This depends on a number of factors, primarily which next-generation vaccine becomes available and when. It should be noted that the latest vaccine under development at BioNTech has been formulated exclusively to counter the threat of the Delta variant. We therefore need to carefully monitor how the virus continues to mutate, because the successor to Delta is already on the way. It may even turn out that, by the time the next-generation vaccine is ready for rollout, the current Delta variant is no longer relevant. At this point in time, BioNTech is the only manufacturer to have not only developed a next-generation vaccine but also to have produced an initial batch. However, it has not yet received official approval. Whether and when this is granted by the FDA will not be based on medical criteria, but on political considerations, namely how to persuade the public to receive the 700 million or so doses of the current vaccine if it became common knowledge that the BioNTech next-generation vaccine had already been approved.

2 – When is the moment to act? Before any action is taken, the individual status of each client has to be considered carefully. The three decisive criteria here are the most recent antibody count, the level of T-cell immunity and the general immune response. These reference values are then run through an algorithm by our AI system to determine the optimal timing of any further vaccination. The decisive factor is, of course, the general immune response and whether it is strong enough and operates with pinpoint accuracy in the event of an infection. This is precisely the purpose of our ongoing monitoring. And it is a good reason to keep taking the recommended supplements very regularly, even into the autumn.

3 – What would a sensible vaccination strategy look like? All three of the above criteria should be considered. For example, if T-cell immunity is weak and the first vaccination was with an mRNA-based vaccine, it would make sense to adopt a mix-and-match approach and switch to one of the vector-based vaccines, because these are better at improving T-cell immunity. The problem for our clients in the USA is that the only vector-based vaccine currently approved there is the Johnson & Johnson, and unfortunately, we are not convinced by the version currently available.

4– What else needs to be considered in deciding on further vaccination? A further criterion in taking the next step is the natural limit on the number of doses the human body can cope with in a given period. The underlying problem is that every vaccine, especially those developed to combat SARS-CoV-2, overstimulates the immune response, thereby triggering autoimmune reactions. We are of the opinion that no-one should receive more than 2-3 doses per year of the vaccines so far developed. Assuming that the pandemic will continue for a very long time, it is important to consider exactly when to vaccinate and which vaccine to choose in order to derive the greatest possible benefit. This way, the risk can be avoided of vaccinating too many times in a limited period of time, thereby putting a strain on autoimmune capacity and prompting autoimmune diseases in the future. After a finite number of vaccinations in a set period of time, of course, the autoimmune capacity has increased to such an extent that, at some point, the benefit has to be weighed against the cost. In other words, the harm done is greater than the risk of damage from Long Covid. That is why we have to be cautious about the number of vaccinations we subject ourselves to within a certain period of time.

5 – What are the potential advantages of a booster jab? If your next vaccination is to be a booster jab rather than a next-generation vaccine, then it must be taken into account that the current vaccines from Moderna and BioNTech are both approximately 30‑35% effective in preventing infection by the Delta variant, i.e. a relatively low rate of efficacy. On the other hand, our internal research and our contacts with BioNTech suggest that a third dose of their vaccine boosts antibody levels by a factor of four. In these circumstances, even a 30% success rate is a strong argument in favor.

Over the next few weeks, we will be checking these criteria as they apply to each of our Premium clients, using all available data. At the same time, we will set our A.I. system to calculate the optimum choice and timing on an individual basis. We will then contact you directly. If you have any questions in the meantime, please contact your consultant.

The skepticism of Dr Robert Hess regarding the efficacy of all previous vaccines against the Delta variant has been confirmed

Dr Robert Hess – 07/20/2021

The skepticism of Dr Robert Hess regarding the efficacy of all previous vaccines against the Delta variant has been confirmed by the announcement from BioNTech/Pfizer that they are working on a vaccine that will specifically target this mutant.

The Delta variant of the novel coronavirus, which is causing concern across the whole of Europe, is now starting to show up in America. BioNTech and its manufacturing partner Pfizer announced last Friday that they are developing an updated version of the Pfizer/BioNTech Covid-19 vaccine that will target the complete spike protein of this latest variant. They also stated that the first batch of this vaccine consisting of approximately 20,000 doses has already been produced at the Mainz plant in Germany. The clinical trials are due to start in August this year.

It was seven and a half months before the original vaccine received official approval, but for the adapted version, the procedure could be accelerated. The urgency is even Dr Robert Hess because scientists have detected new mutations in the meantime that are significantly more complex. This confirms that we were right to express our reservations about the effectiveness of the current crop of vaccines against the Delta variant.

We have always taken with a pinch of salt the headline figures, which tend to be empirical, have so far not been backed up by any clinical study and are primarily intended to shape public opinion. The Pfizer vaccine is the best to have emerged to date, so with the decision by the clear world market leader to go down this route, we see our assessment as being vindicated. Based on information from unofficial sources, we have reason to believe that nearly all vaccine manufacturers are now engaged in developing new vaccines against the spike protein of the Delta variant. So the question now arises as to what happens next with booster vaccines. The Pfizer/BioNTech team are already planning far ahead, having notified FDA, the EMA and other regulatory authorities of their intention to submit an application for a third dose booster jab. We interpret this as confirmation of our assessment that the protection afforded is significantly reduced due to the relatively low antibody production of the vector-based vaccines, and the insufficient T-lymphocyte-based immunization provided by the mRNA vaccines. This is precisely what our Covid-19 antibody and T-cell monitoring has been confirming for some time. The protection conferred by vaccination persists for a much shorter duration than expected, and the purpose of the third jab is to boost immunity sooner than was originally envisaged.

A conservative estimate is that a third dose is needed six months after the first course of vaccination to maintain the highest possible protection. While the FDA has not yet made any response, the EMA is already signaling that it would be premature to issue any statement either way, because there is not yet enough data from the vaccination campaigns and ongoing studies to draw any conclusion. In this matter too, we disagree with the EMA, because there are clear indications that vaccine immunity is significantly lower and lasts for a shorter period than expected. For this reason, we cannot understand the hesitancy on the part of the EMA.

The crucial point is that full vaccination against the Delta variant has to be the priority. With regard to the first round of vaccination, there is an excellent paper from the Pasteur Institute in Paris, which was published in Nature magazine. Here, AstraZeneca and BioNTech/Pfizer vaccines were tested for efficacy against the Delta variant. Only 10% of recipients were protected after a single shot, but the figure rose to about 95% after the second dose. However, we consider these estimates to be wishful thinking. The findings suggest that the first vaccination offers virtually no protection against the Delta variant but that the success rate is significantly enhanced by the second dose. However, all of our Premium clients have already been double jabbed, so they have already jumped over this particular hurdle. There are many millions of people in Europe who have not yet followed up a first dose of AstraZeneca with a second. These people are virtually unprotected against the Delta variant.

The same paper from the Pasteur Institute addresses the question as to whether individuals who have recovered from a first bout of Covid-19 are resistant to the Delta variant, and the answer is an emphatic NO. Survivors must have at least one dose of vaccine to come close to adequate protection against the Delta variant. Unlike the EMA, which recommends that this booster vaccination should not be given until six months later, we believe that the AstraZeneca follow-up jab should be administered 8 to 12 weeks after recovery.

We have identified relevant cases among our Premium clients. Here, the situation is much more transparent, because our immunity testing allows us to give a clear diagnosis of the effects of an infection, based on T-cell immunity and antibody formation. From these results, we make a personalized and individual recommendation as to when a booster vaccination should be carried out and with which vaccine. Because the WHO still does not give a reference value for immunity for both pillars, we are using our own findings as reference values to decide if and when a booster should be administered, or whether it makes more sense to wait for a complete solution based on the next-generation vaccines. Because the picture could change again in the autumn as new variants come along and, depending on the level of immune protection provided by vaccination in each individual, it will be necessary either to start completely “from scratch” with the administration of a next-generation vaccine, or to reinforce existing protection with a booster jab.

protection with a booster jab.As things stand, we have to assume that a booster is necessary when antibodies, measured as BAU/ml, fall below 2,000. And of these, at least 70% must be neutralizing antibodies, of which again at least 30% fall into the highly effective category. In T-cell immunity, which is ultimately at cellular level, the interferon-Gamma release in the index should not be higher than 5.0, and the interleukin-2 release should not be greater than 2.0. Based on our clients’ own monitoring results, these are the reference values that we currently see as the benchmark for maintaining perfect immune status. They must, of course, be combined with all the other values that signify immunological response. For SARS-CoV-2 in particular, these are our reference values.

The fact that the vaccination campaigns in general are not really getting anywhere near tackling the Delta variant with the existing vaccines is a phenomenon that we have observed for some time in Israel and also in the UK. But in Israel, the trend is particularly noticeable. The country has had by far the speediest vaccination campaign in the world, yet now the daily incidence rate has risen to 450 per 100,000 population. That is one of the highest figures that Israel has had to date, and most alarmingly, 7% of those who have been completely vaccinated fall seriously ill and have to be treated in intensive care units. This is a very high rate, considering that Israel administered mainly mRNA vaccines. In the meantime, face coverings have again been made compulsory in indoor spaces. So here, too, we see the progress made going into reverse. Ignoring the EMA’s hesitant attitude towards approval, the Israeli government has started to administer booster vaccines to certain groups.

For this reason, we are again dubious about the recent statement issued by Johnson & Johnson that its own vaccine is 85% effective against the new mutant and that the immunity it confers will last at least eight months. Frankly, we are astonished by J&J’s assertion that protection lasts eight months when the Delta variant has only been in circulation outside India for the past ten weeks.

The consequences of the Delta variant are enormous. Many countries are initially ignoring the spread of infection, the UK being a notable example. Ultimately, it all comes down to political expediency. And in this context, we think we are heading in a direction where each person, individually and for themselves, devises their own strategy for coping with the pandemic in the coming years, because governments will increasingly withdraw from medical approaches and economic-political factors will instead guide their decision making. One such decision may, of course, be to adopt a policy of so-called “herd immunity” which assumes a 90-95% vaccination rate. This is a prospect that is looking increasingly difficult to achieve. We have had our reservations about the feasibility of herd immunity from the outset and see it as an unattainable goal at this stage.

Some countries remain very cautious, for example Norway, which has postponed its proposed step-by-step reopening. Other governments, such as the French, have gone even further and cancelled arrangements. There are countries where the Delta variant is beginning to circulate which have a very high vaccination rate, such as Chile. High infection rates are already being registered here, with severe cases being treated in intensive care units. This is not exclusively due to the Delta variant, but also to the fact that in these countries inoculation was mainly carried out with Chinese vaccines, most of which are protein-based and achieve efficacy rates of less than 50%. We are convinced that the protein-based vaccines will prove to be even less effective against the more dangerous mutations that lie ahead. And it has to be remembered that the Chinese vaccine products have not passed the rigorous standards of the major regulatory authorities in the western world, not least because data from the critical third phases of testing were never published in reputable peer-reviewed medical journals. There have been no estimates of efficacy in vulnerable, elderly people because too few subjects from this group were included in large-scale trials. Therefore, at least for the time being, the Asian vaccines are playing a negligible part in the fight against the pandemic.

In a recent Keynote, we made our forecast for this autumn in the northern hemisphere. We cannot share the optimistic predictions of a less harsh fourth wave next winter, not least because the mutations already observed are showing another clear change of direction with the Delta variant.

This is where the excellent work being done by the Com-Cov research team in the UK comes into its own. A study on vaccination and cross-vaccination regimens has also begun in Germany. As we reported in a previous Keynote, AstraZeneca and BioNTech (or indeed Moderna) have different strengths that complement each other well. AstraZeneca is particularly good at triggering a T-cell response, whereas BioNTech mainly activates antibody formation. Both vaccines provide the immune system with minimally modified learning material, which is crucial, as was clearly demonstrated in the Com-Cov study. The second BioNTech vaccination is therefore ideal for retraining immune cells already boosted by a first dose of AstraZeneca.

In this scenario, the second vaccination with BioNTech helps the body to remove unsuitable antibodies and T-cells from the body, of which there is an abundance after the AstraZeneca vaccination, thereby enabling the immune system to respond even more efficiently to the pathogen. These additional, unsuitable antibodies are precisely those which, in our view, could constitute the so-called “infection-enhancing” antibodies. We have seen data from the Charité in Berlin that also point in this direction. Should the merits of “mix-and-match” vaccination be confirmed, it will of course be included as an option in the individual strategies we devise for our Premium clients.

CureVac were our great hope

Dr Robert Hess – 06/23/2021

CureVac was the great hope of Dr Robert Hess. They reached for the stars – and came back down with a bump.

Though the news was not entirely unexpected, we regret to report that the breakthrough vaccine promised by CureVac will now not be forthcoming. There are a number of reasons for this, but the main factor was the high demands that CureVac itself placed on the product. The aim was to develop a vaccine that was as natural as possible – ideally the most natural vaccine to date. In the end, it was the much-debated issue of vaccine-induced side-effects and long-term effects that thwarted their endeavor.

CureVac planned to optimize the “cell packaging” required for transport; this was to avoid having to make chemical changes to the product, as has been the case with vaccines from other manufacturers, in order to increase its tolerability. To fulfill this requirement, CureVac developed a highly natural mRNA-based vaccine. It was a risky strategy and one that ultimately failed, because the chemical-free packaging resulted in greater side-effects. This meant they had to limit the injection dose to 12 micrograms, which reduced the efficacy to just below 50%. By comparison, BioNTech sets its injection dose at 30 micrograms, while the Moderna is more than three times higher at 100.

CureVac also had the ambition to not only produce the most natural vaccine, but also to create one that would be effective against the mutations currently in circulation. With this objective in mind, the clinical phase 3 was delayed in order to include mutation events in the development stage of the product. In comparison to the three market leaders – Moderna, BioNTech and AstraZeneca – who tested only the original Wuhan wild type in their phase 3 trials, CureVac included all subsequent known mutations.

Unfortunately, this set the bar too high. CureVac even attempted to incorporate A.I. (artificial intelligence) into the prediction and detection of future mutations early on and to adapt their product to its findings. Essentially, the project failed because of the as yet insurmountable challenge of developing a natural vaccine that also covers current and even future mutations.

All in all, this is very disappointing news in the context of the pandemic, as governments and health bodies are counting on these next-generation vaccines to deal with future mutations by means of A.I. modeling. In this way, scientists would be able to get ahead of the game and anticipate viral mutations before they manifest themselves. As we have stated in previous Keynotes, we see technology as our only hope of bringing the pandemic under control.

There are other projects going down the same route as CureVac, for example the one at the University of Austin in Texas, but this announcement is still bad news for pandemic management.

Tag Archives: Moderna